Re: RT and XFS

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:34:57PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> (I do disagree with Christoph on another point: i do think we eventually 
> want to change the standard semaphore type in a similar fashion upstream 
> as well - but that probably has to come with a s/struct semaphore/struct 
> mutex/ change as well.)

Actually having a mutex_t in mainline would be a good idea even without
preempt rt, to document better what kind of locking we expect.