| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4 |
| From: | Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jun 2005 04:57:03 -0400 |
| Cc: | Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Wayne Steenburg <w.steenburg@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <620614.d53037961dceb73fbe2a31af34e1bb64.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| References: | <1117576633.5018.12.camel@FC3Work> <20050601035347.GB20301@kevlar.burdell.org> <20050601061802.GB7359@lemming.cita.utoronto.ca> <620614.d53037961dceb73fbe2a31af34e1bb64.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:06:41AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > OTOH, I run fc3 at home with the default kernel (4k stacks) and XFS > > and it's very stable. So for simple workloads and setups 4k stacks > > are usually fine. > > XFS on most IDE/SCSI drives with RAID, dm, LVM, etc. should be OK. > Is it just when you have XFS + LVM + NFS that the stack problems show up the most? I've used XFS + NFS on a 4k-stack kernel w/out any problems. Sonny |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Chris Wedgwood |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |