| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS |
| From: | Robin Humble <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:05:09 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050601040009.GA11354@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| References: | <20050531074820.GM8770@neu.nirvana> <462608.672469a40d5f4a17f7b1f43a4517535a.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050531215402.GE23991@neu.nirvana> <477395.f3b7fdadc14ce50b8c44d1f319df1ab6.IBX@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050601034202.GA31105@neu.nirvana> <20050601040009.GA11354@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:00:09PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: >When I talked (bitched?) to some RH people about the problems with XFS >and 4KSTACKS they claimed that ext3 is faster than XFS is pretty much >any meaningful benchmark on 8-CPU machines or smaller. I think RedHat are mistaken. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/linux-xfs/2005-03/msg00189.html cheers, robin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Axel Thimm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS module for RHEL4, Robin Humble |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: out of the tree compilation and 4KSTACKS, Axel Thimm |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 936891 - simplify XFS_PURGE_INODE, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |