| To: | Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1] |
| From: | "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:50:41 -0700 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hare@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050412110425.GA3063@elf.ucw.cz> |
| References: | <20050410211808.GA12118@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050410212747.GB26316@elf.ucw.cz> <20050410225708.GB12118@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050410230053.GD12794@elf.ucw.cz> <20050411043124.GA24626@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050411105759.GB1373@elf.ucw.cz> <20050411231213.GD702@frodo> <20050411235110.GA2472@elf.ucw.cz> <20050412002603.GA1178@frodo> <20050412110425.GA3063@elf.ucw.cz> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:04:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > OK, so if that doesn't help, here's an alternate approach - this > > lets xfsbufd track when its entering the refrigerator(), so that > > other callers know that attempts to wake it are futile. > > Thanks, this patch helped. I can confirm, the 2nd patch worked and the 1st one didn't. (This is against 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 with sched-x86-patch-name-is-way-too-long.patch backed out. ;) ) -Barry K. Nathan <barryn@xxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Pavel Machek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Problem running xfs_repair - it crashes., Paul Neilson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Pavel Machek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [xfs-masters] swsusp vs. xfs [was Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1], Rafael J. Wysocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |