| To: | Junfeng Yang <yjf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CHECKER] XFS doesn't respect mount -o sync (XFS, 2.6.11) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:17:39 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, mc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0503120202580.10379-100000@elaine24.Stanford.EDU> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0503120202580.10379-100000@elaine24.Stanford.EDU> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 02:14:50AM -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > We are from the Stanford Checker team and are working on a file system > checker called FiSC. We checked XFS and found that even when a XFS > partition is mounted -o sync, file system operations are still not sync'ed > correctly. Its -o wsync in XFS. This is the IRIX way, anyway - from a bit of man page reading. We should be stitching that into -o sync a bit better in XFS. The combination of -o wsync,sync should get you the equivalent behaviour at the moment though, I think. > We are not sure if this is the expected behavior on XFS or not, so your > inputs on this are well appreciated. Try using -o wsync for your tests, I'll look into our interpretation of -o sync in XFS in the meantime. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: fs.xfs.refcache ?, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fc3 and stacks, Robin Humble |
| Previous by Thread: | [CHECKER] XFS doesn't respect mount -o sync (XFS, 2.6.11), Junfeng Yang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS Problem, Alex King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |