| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question |
| From: | Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:18:24 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4207C7C9.8060005@xfs.org> |
| References: | <20050207173755.GA24277@kevlar.burdell.org> <4207C7C9.8060005@xfs.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:55:53PM -0600, Steve Lord wrote: > Sonny Rao wrote: > >Random question: If a file is being written (to memory) and hasn't > >been allocated, then will calling the FIBMAP-ioctl on that file force > >allocation ? > > > >Sonny > > > > Yes, at least it did last time I looked. Otherwise things like lilo > fall over in a heap. > > Steve Ok that makes sense, I was seeing huge file fragmentation and thought maybe running filefrag was causing it, but it was actually because of holes in the file. I didn't realize that cp kept holes in files :-P Sonny |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Delayed Allocation Question, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |