| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs caching and data loss |
| From: | Martin Schröder <ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:49:04 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0502010421060.26021@jekyll.uws.edu.au> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Strasse 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany |
| References: | <F62740B0EFCFC74AA6DCF52CD746242D01033823@iu-mssg-mbx05.exchange.iu.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0502010421060.26021@jekyll.uws.edu.au> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 2005-02-01 05:02:44 +1100, David J N Begley wrote: > In that sense, from what I can tell XFS risks data loss (data intended to be > sent to the disk but it never made it before the power disappeared) - though > so does any other file system (only the amount varies). IBTD: Take a look at ffs with soft updates and disabled hdd write cache. http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix2000/general/full_papers/seltzer/seltzer_html/index.html or http://tinyurl.com/20c2 Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, ms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 http://www.artcom-gmbh.de |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | Suggestions for xfs, Daniel E. |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Suggestions for xfs, Daniel E. |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |