| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: defrag xfs |
| From: | Sonny Rao <sonny@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:07:07 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050121190521.GA15073@kevlar.burdell.org> |
| References: | <F62740B0EFCFC74AA6DCF52CD746242D010337FA@iu-mssg-mbx05.exchange.iu.edu> <41F07494.1060501@xfs.org> <20050121043237.GA28699@kevlar.burdell.org> <1106286413.8580.66.camel@kennedy> <20050121054830.GA29637@kevlar.burdell.org> <m18y6n1ede.fsf@muc.de> <20050121070221.GA30287@kevlar.burdell.org> <41F11609.4020907@xfs.org> <20050121190521.GA15073@kevlar.burdell.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
One more question, I read in the original docs that the minimum number of AGs is 8, is that enforced or assumed anywhere? A few cursory greps through xfsprogs didn't indicate anything that seemed like a lower bound. If there is such a limit, then obiously there could be a problem when shrinking a filesystem with only 8 AGs (though one could argue such a filesystem is so small that who cares, etc.) Sonny |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: incorrect quota usage, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: defrag xfs, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: defrag xfs, Greg Freemyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: defrag xfs, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |