| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures |
| From: | Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:11:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zaphodb@xxxxxxxxxxx, marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx, piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041202161839.736352c2.akpm@osdl.org> |
| References: | <20041116170527.GA3525@mail.muni.cz> <20041121014350.GJ4999@zaphods.net> <20041121024226.GK4999@zaphods.net> <20041202195422.GA20771@mail.muni.cz> <20041202122546.59ff814f.akpm@osdl.org> <20041202210348.GD20771@mail.muni.cz> <20041202223146.GA31508@zaphods.net> <20041202145610.49e27b49.akpm@osdl.org> <20041202231837.GB15185@mail.muni.cz> <20041202161839.736352c2.akpm@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 04:18:39PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > All I can say is "experiment with it". > > It might be useful to renice kswapd so that userspace processes do not > increase its latency. Hmm, increasing the min free kb to 64MB and renicing kswapd to -8 seems to solve the issue. However, for me it seems as not so good solution mainly because 2.6.6-bk4 kernel is just ok without any tweeks. -- Lukáš Hejtmánek |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures, Lukas Hejtmanek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures, Lukas Hejtmanek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |