xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Special, optimized mount options for a squid cache directory?
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 23:10:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <41630B3C.1020904@gmx.net>
References: <20041005101019.GM23416@charite.de> <41630B3C.1020904@gmx.net>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
* evilninja <evilninja@xxxxxxx>:

> -o noatime would probably make sense for a cache/spool dir. but it's not
> bound to xfs really.

D'oh. Whoever set this machine up forgot to use noatime. Fixed.

> PS: hm, some googling revealed http://eyck.forumakad.pl/~eyck/log/2004/03/
> bad news for xfs in this report, but no real benchmarks shown, just
> unproven statements ;)

ReiserFS is for people who don't need their data.


-- 
_________________________________________________

  Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
_________________________________________________

  Ralf Hildebrandt
   i.A. des IT-Zentrum | Netzwerkdienste
   Stabsstelle des Klinikumsvorstandes
   Campus Benjamin Franklin
   Hindenburgdamm 30 | Berlin
   Tel. +49 30 450 570155 | Fax +49 30 8445-4447
   Ralf.Hildebrandt@xxxxxxxxxx
   http://www.charite.de



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>