xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes

To: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PARTIAL TAKE 921072 - fix handling of bad inodes
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:30:13 +0100
Cc: gnb@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095891877.2408.10.camel@localhost>; from christian.guggenberger@physik.uni-regensburg.de on Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 12:24:37AM +0200
References: <E1CAF8J-0002e5-00@maine.americas.sgi.com> <1095890867.2408.1.camel@localhost> <20040922230940.A7344@infradead.org> <1095891877.2408.10.camel@localhost>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
> a second question comes to my mind:
> 
> is this dcache stuff considered for a merge into linus/marcello tree in
> the near future? I have not seen any related discussion on lkml recently
> (I need to admit that I do not read lkml on a regulary basis...)

I think Greg Banks has been working with Neil on this one, Greg do you
know if/what is blocking to get this patch into mainline?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>