| To: | James Foris <james.foris@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+ |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 14:24:11 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4148B636.8070505@med.ge.com> |
| References: | <411A8410.2030000@med.ge.com> <20040910041106.GA14336@frodo> <4144B19A.2020407@med.ge.com> <4145D141.1040907@med.ge.com> <20040914095914.A4118499@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <41472212.1090605@med.ge.com> <20040915015002.GA12795@frodo> <20040915083307.GA14251@frodo> <4148B636.8070505@med.ge.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 04:37:58PM -0500, James Foris wrote: > It worked against linus' current tree (2.6.9-rc2), and initial tests > look VERY good! Ah, good to hear. > It will take a few days to get access to the high-speed RAID so that > I can test the effects out there, but this is definately the right track! > > I will report what happens. Thanks. > I guess the question now is what is needed to get this broadly > reviewed, tested, finalized, and (hopefully) into the mainline? I'll push it along once I've tidied it up a bit & am happy that its correct; you needn't worry about that side of things. > Also, where can I pick up the XFS test/validation suite that I have > seen discussed here ? (It does not seem to be packaged anywhere > on the oss.sgi.com FTP site.) In the xfs-cmds cvs tree, the xfstests directory. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | xfs_force_shutdown called on hardware RAID5+0 XFS filesystem, slaton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs_force_shutdown called on hardware RAID5+0 XFS filesystem, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+, James Foris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS performance issues: O_DIRECT and Linux 2.6.6+, James Foris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |