xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE 904196 - update split patches

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TAKE 904196 - update split patches
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 22:25:10 -0800
In-reply-to: <200408090421.i794LHJ12766@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200408090421.i794LHJ12766@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 02:21:17PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Update 2.4 split patches for 2.4.27 merge.
> 
> Date:  Sun Aug  8 21:20:28 PDT 2004
> Workarea:  chook.melbourne.sgi.com:/build/nathans/2.4.x-xfs
> Inspected by:  nathans
> 
> The following file(s) were checked into:
>   bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.4.x-xfs
> 
> 
> Modid:  2.4.x-xfs:linux:176622a
> split-patches/series - 1.8
> split-patches/rwsem-backport - 1.2
> split-patches/downgrade_write-backport - 1.2

how important are these particular patches?  is there any serious
issue with using 2.4.27 mainline?

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpxvUPhf6Oml.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>