xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken

To: Jan Banan <b@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:49:24 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <410ADC0A.6060100@grabbarna.nu>
References: <40F6DBC1.6050909@grabbarna.nu> <20040715205910.GA9948@taniwha.stupidest.org> <40F9321C.7060403@grabbarna.nu> <20040717203943.GL20260@plato.local.lan> <410ADC0A.6060100@grabbarna.nu>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 01:38:50AM +0200, Jan Banan wrote:

> I have tried thiS two times now and after about four hours the
> computer Crashes with this in /var/log/messages :

it's not a crash, it's the IDE layer bitching

> Second time the last sector mentioned was 28117656. Maybe I should
> try to skip over that and start right after that sector? If I read
> the man-page of "dd" right I should add something like
> "seek=28117718 skip=28117718" to that command-line to perform
> that.

yes, but conv=noerror should also skip over the bad sector too.  did
it not continue after this?

also, did you get the SMART values from the bad disk?  i still think
it's worth forcing a realloction and using the existing disk if it's
not *that* bad


  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>