xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1

To: Matthew Geier <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ISO installer for RH9 with XFS 1.3.1
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:04:18 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4102E006.3070309@arts.usyd.edu.au>
References: <00cf01c47171$fabcb210$0100a8c0@valleychase> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407241103160.16275@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <4102E006.3070309@arts.usyd.edu.au>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 08:17:42AM +1000, Matthew Geier wrote:

> It's all there, it's just if you do an XFS install and xfsprogs is
> the only package it needs from CD4, at the start it won't say it
> needs CD4, it will just 'spring that on you' later on when it
> actually needs CD4 to get the xfsprogs packages off it.

this might sound silly, but i've never done a fc install so humor
me...

i assume you can install *almost* everything you absolutely need from
the first CD right?  except for xfsprogs on CD4 --- if that is the
case shouldn't someone open a bug with RH to have this mode to CD1
(since it's small I can't see why this would be a big deal)


  --cw


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>