| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC) |
| From: | Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:03:07 +0200 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040624145545.GA11382@infradead.org> |
| References: | <20040621072906.GD1656@frodo> <20040622082906.GA2093@frodo> <20040623084922.GD1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040623203639.A1670881@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040623131611.GE1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040624024320.GB5866@frodo> <20040624114608.GF1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040624121441.GA9419@infradead.org> <20040624135722.GG1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040624145545.GA11382@infradead.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:55:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Dumb question: didn't you want to try CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG or is this a > heisenbug that goes away if it's turned on? > I didn't think about it actually. As I recall there have been some bug reports from xfs users who had CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y and they were suggested not to enable it unless asked to :) Yes, that definitely may be the reason why I didn't enable it. I'll turn it on and re-test if desired. Krzysztof |
| Previous by Date: | XFS partition problem, Raphael Bauduin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |