| To: | Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:43:20 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040623131611.GE1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> |
| References: | <20040529155852.GA30391@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040604130816.GA12556@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621010330.GA1295@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621021505.GA1173@frodo> <20040621025905.GA1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621072906.GD1656@frodo> <20040622082906.GA2093@frodo> <20040623084922.GD1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040623203639.A1670881@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040623131611.GE1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > > > Currently I'm running kernel with > > > - 1.1371.750.18 [XFS] cleanup pagebuf flag usage and simplify > > > pagebuf_free. > > > reverted as well. No conclusions on this one yet, though. > > > > (...) > > Firstly, I guess it would be good to verify that 2.6.4 really > > does work. Then, I would focus on all (and there shouldn't be > > _too_ many) mods that modified xfs_buf.c -- a bk revtool on > > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c will give the list going back to > > 2.6.4 (and further if needed). > > It seems that changes included in 1.1371.750.18 may be responsible > for discussed behavior. Machine's been running without problems > for over 5 hours now. I'll stress it more and let know whether > this state is persistent. Ah - thanks, I'll study that change and get back to you. cheers. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | TAKE 907752 - xfstests, FSG QA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE 904196 - split-patches, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC), Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |