xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC)

To: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs oops (CVS-2004-05-15_05:00_UTC)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:43:20 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040623131611.GE1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl>
References: <20040529155852.GA30391@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040604130816.GA12556@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621010330.GA1295@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621021505.GA1173@frodo> <20040621025905.GA1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040621072906.GD1656@frodo> <20040622082906.GA2093@frodo> <20040623084922.GD1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl> <20040623203639.A1670881@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040623131611.GE1323@iceberg.elsat.net.pl>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:16:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
> 
> Hi Nathan,
> 
> > > Currently I'm running kernel with
> > > - 1.1371.750.18 [XFS] cleanup pagebuf flag usage and simplify 
> > > pagebuf_free.
> > > reverted as well. No conclusions on this one yet, though.
> > > 
> (...)
> > Firstly, I guess it would be good to verify that 2.6.4 really
> > does work.  Then, I would focus on all (and there shouldn't be
> > _too_ many) mods that modified xfs_buf.c -- a bk revtool on
> > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c will give the list going back to
> > 2.6.4 (and further if needed).
> 
> It seems that changes included in 1.1371.750.18 may be responsible
> for discussed behavior. Machine's been running without problems
> for over 5 hours now. I'll stress it more and let know whether
> this state is persistent.

Ah - thanks, I'll study that change and get back to you.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>