| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bug 335] New: XFS Oops with 2.6.7-rc3 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:49:32 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040609224318.GA5570@taniwha.stupidest.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 03:43:18PM -0700 |
| References: | <200406090934.i599YaKP022234@oss.sgi.com> <m3k6yhknae.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org> <20040609224318.GA5570@taniwha.stupidest.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 03:43:18PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:01:45PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > This patch fixes it. The problem is that XFS expects __GFP_NOFAIL to > > never return NULL, but it returns NULL anyways when PF_MEMALLOC is > > set for the current process. This patch just readds looping in the > > XFS allocator. > > I thought we had something like this? Anyhow, since this does appear > to be required and it's been about for a while --- I wonder why it's > not been merged? Christoph wasn't quite happy with it, and has an alternate fix pending. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem size much less than partition size, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.6 kernel problems, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bug 335] New: XFS Oops with 2.6.7-rc3, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 915835 - xfs_check, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |