| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unsupported sector size |
| From: | Johann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 May 2004 19:00:14 +0200 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404302319480.6656-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404302319480.6656-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | johann.lombardi@xxxxxxx |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
> you get this message if: > > you have 0 data blocks in your fs > or > your data block count doesn't jive with the allocation groups & ag size > > try: > > xfs_db /dev/whatever > sb 0 > p dblocks > p agcount > p agblocks > > and send the results (and look at that line in xfs_mount.c and sort out > what's wrong if you'd like) Here is the output of xfs_db: # xfs_db /dev/sdc xfs_db: sb 0 xfs_db: p dblocks dblocks = 6553600 xfs_db: p agcount agcount = 26 xfs_db: p agblocks agblocks = 262144 dblocks is not 0, so we must be in the second case. Is agcount x agblocks supposed to be equal to dblocks? Johann |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unsupported sector size, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs 1.3.3 beta 1 stock kernel source configure problems, Chris Green |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unsupported sector size, Johann Lombardi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unsupported sector size, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |