xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS?

To: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: typo in XFS_IOC_GETXFLAGS?
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:04:17 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040504105629.GA1531@MAIL.13thfloor.at>; from herbert@13thfloor.at on Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:56:30PM +0200
References: <20040503215840.GA26617@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040504085546.B127559@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040503230042.GA27312@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040504123233.D149002@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20040504105629.GA1531@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Hi Herbert,

On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:32:34PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > 
> > Actually, it turns out that both of these are fine (thought
> > I tested this!) because the XFS_XFLAG and XFS_DIFLAG values
> 
> well, never said that it wouldn't work ;)

Heh.

> PS: is there some documentation about the XFS 
> quota code, I'd like to extend the quota system
> by allowing more than one quota hash for each
> filesystem (vfsmount)

Not really.  The code has a fairly liberal sprinkling of comments
though, thats probably your best bet.  Can you elaborate a bit
more on what you mean by one quota hash for each fs?  (separate
dquot hash tables per-fs?)  Is that based on observed performance
problems, or to provide some alternate functionality...?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>