xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS

To: Bart Samwel <bart@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Laptop mode support for XFS
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:55:56 +0100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1080899086.5032.346.camel@samwel.tk>; from bart@samwel.tk on Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:44:47AM +0200
References: <E1B9KzA-00083v-Is@samwel.tk> <20040402103333.A787@infradead.org> <1080899086.5032.346.camel@samwel.tk>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:44:47AM +0200, Bart Samwel wrote:
> The maximums that are listed for the regular flush_interval and
> age_buffer are way too low for laptop mode usage. I've considered
> increasing the maximums, but I figured they would be that low for a
> reason. By doing it this way, the maximums for regular usage aren't
> affected. If everybody thinks it's OK to simply increase the maximums on
> the regular ones to INT_MAX (or at least something like HZ*7200), I'll
> _gladly_ do that instead.

There's no real problem with large intervals (except the possible data
loss on a crash), so I'd say enlarge them.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>