| To: | Daniel van Eeden <daniel@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: old xfsprogs tarbals |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:14:42 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1080723666.8003.12.camel@daniel> |
| References: | <1080723666.8003.12.camel@daniel> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 11:01:07AM +0200, Daniel van Eeden wrote: > I'm maintaining a source based linux distribution which uses XFS as > default filesystem. The buildscripts usualy use the official tarbals > from the official locations. That's not posible with xfsprogs and > such. Can the scripts not cvs checkout the required files? > The old tarbals seem to disapear, which is against the (L)GPL as far > as I know. Is it? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | old xfsprogs tarbals, Daniel van Eeden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: old xfsprogs tarbals, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | old xfsprogs tarbals, Daniel van Eeden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: old xfsprogs tarbals, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |