| To: | "IKARASHI, Seiichi" <ikarashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: synchronization of XFS |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:47:51 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040325124152.GA12078@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> |
| References: | <4060F7FC.8090602@miraclelinux.com> <20040325063902.GA9697@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> <4062C97A.6030702@miraclelinux.com> <20040325124152.GA12078@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 04:41:52AM -0800, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > That sounds like something else. sync() ensures dirty buffers are > on-disk. Even if you don't sync() you can still read-back using the > buffer-cache/page-cache. OK, I understand now. Calling sync() multuple times is still baindead. How about umount/mount and see if that forces the data to appear? If so, please try a newer kernel as the sync paths were rewritten and might fix your problem. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: losing disk space, Chris Wedgwood |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: synchronization of XFS, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: synchronization of XFS, Chris Wedgwood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: synchronization of XFS, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |