| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Problem between XFS and JFS |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:28:25 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20040223115308.GC1003@plato.local.lan>; from erbenson@alaska.net on Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:53:08AM -0900 |
| References: | <4039E05C.6050602@interfilme.com> <20040223115308.GC1003@plato.local.lan> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:53:08AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > sounds like mkfs.jfs is not zeroing enough of the device prior to > writing its fs. particularly block zero where the XFS superblock > lives. (some mkfs avoid zeroing this due to quirky partitioning setups > on some architectures, notably Suns). or x86 where people like to put their bootloader in there :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 905452 -, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Filesystem kernel hangup, 2.6.3 (bad: scheduling while atomic!), Mikael Wahlberg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Problem between XFS and JFS, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | PARTIAL TAKE 905452 -, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |