xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4

To: Jeremy Jackson <jerj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XFS merged in 2.4
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:07:34 +0000
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, XFS List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3FD7853A.6020505@coplanar.net>; from jerj@coplanar.net on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:42:34PM -0500
References: <20031210101142.GF3294@plato.local.lan> <1071076851.2337.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3FD7853A.6020505@coplanar.net>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:42:34PM -0500, Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > ACLs are also available for even many virtual FS in 2.6 now, with many
> > backports going to 2.4 for bugfixes, etc. Since ACLs are part of the XFS
> > code-base, I'd imagine they'd come along. Christoph?
> > 
> 
> As for dmapi - they probably want it at the VFS layer so other FS can 
> implement it, rather than just tunneling through VFS with an ioctl to 
> XFS specific API.

DMAPI is broken by design and can't work reliably with the Linux VFS
design unless you take special care (see the mountpoint option for
it).  It should never go into mainline.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>