| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ? |
| From: | Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfrode@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:06:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312042022250.19532-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20031204220923.GB2849@ii.uib.no> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312042022250.19532-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:23:27PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I'd suggest getting Axel's RPM from atrpms... that's what > I just did for my home system. :) It's easy enough > for us to spin one, but now that Axel is doing this, I'm > happy to point over there... I still can't find any updated kernel from Axel's atrpms. The kernels there seems all to be based on RedHats 2.4.20-20.x without any mention of extra patches for the do_brk(). I'm a bit disappointed that SGI isn't more closely following up on security patches or redhat errata kernels. If it's "easy enough", why not just do it, and stop pushing a kernel with a serious security vulnerability from the project home page? -jf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | difficulty downloading xfs tests, Sanjay Kumar, Noida |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ?, Net Llama! |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: do_brk() -- kernel 2.4.20-24.9.XFS ?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |