| To: | Darrell Michaud <dmichaud@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 11:28:08 -0500 |
| Cc: | Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1070381443.5316.260.camel@atherne> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312021346530.13692-100000@logos.cnet> <1070381443.5316.260.camel@atherne> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:10:43AM -0500, Darrell Michaud wrote:
> As a user it would be very beneficial for me to have XFS support in the
> official 2.4 kernel tree. XFS been stable and "2.4 integration-ready"
> for a long time, and 2.4 is going to be used in certain environments for
> a long time, if only because it's easier to upgrade a 2.4 kernel to a
> newer 2.4 kernel than to upgrade to a 2.6 kernel. It seems like an easy
> case to make.
>
> I use other filesystems and some funky drivers as well.. and I'm always
> very happy to see useful backports show up in the 2.4 tree. Thank you!
This can also be done in patch form, as it is done now :)
There are several pieces of backported software that are
integration-ready, but that doesn't imply they should go into an
increasingly-frozen 2.4.x tree...
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, venom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, venom |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |