| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS for 2.4 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:28:41 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <20031202092004.GA962@plato.local.lan>; from erbenson@alaska.net on Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:20:04AM -0900 |
| References: | <20031201062052.GA2022@frodo> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312011202330.13692-100000@logos.cnet> <20031201221058.GA621@frodo> <20031202092004.GA962@plato.local.lan> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:20:04AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > Another point, 2.6 is not yet stable or fully usuable on many non-x86 > architectures, such as powerpc. 2.6 seems to be much better than 2.4 at least for recent pmac hardware.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Ethan Benson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.22 XFS 1.3.1 reservation ran out, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS for 2.4, Marcelo Tosatti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |