| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:25:55 -0800 |
| Cc: | beto@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20031127211827.GB708@frodo> |
| References: | <3FBECF7E.6010509@kasenna.com> <3FBFEF6A.3000609@kasenna.com> <20031127004420.77f31a9c.akpm@osdl.org> <20031127211827.GB708@frodo> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > hi Andrew, > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:44:20AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Alberto Nava <beto@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I've done some more digging on this issue. The reason the > > > request is going in 4k pages is that the direct-io code is > > > giving up in do_direct_IO() and the request is issued as buffer IO :-(. > > > > You seem to be using a -mm kernel. It has extensive and not-quite-complete > > and not-really-tested-at-all-with-XFS direct-io changes. > > > Alberto's original mail said: > > > I'm seeing a very strange behavior when I write to a file using 512k > > direct-io writes. The filesystem is XFS and the kernel is 2.6.0-test9. > I know. But the code which he quoted had -mm stuff in it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - xfstests, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux 2.4.22 XFS 1.3.1 reservation ran out, Soumen Chakrabarti |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: direct-IO writes strange behavior, Alberto Nava |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |