xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: logbufs size?

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: logbufs size?
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:35:57 +0100
Cc: netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mloftis@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031122123333.A1676816@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <44770656.1069426480@[10.1.2.77]> <20031122101921.B1582457@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <3FBEA6A3.9090706@linux-sxs.org> <20031122123333.A1676816@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:33:33 +1100
Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:58:27PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On 11/21/03 15:19, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > 
> > > 2 is the default, although nowadays its automatically bumped up
> > > if you have oodles of memory (iirc).  If you are using a non-
> > > default value it will show up in /proc/mounts -- e.g.
> > > /dev/sdb2 /home xfs rw,usrquota,grpquota,logbufs=8 0 0
> > 
> > Just curious, how much is oodles?  I've got a box with 12GB that doesn't 
> > show any logbufs.
> > 
> 
> I don't remember off the top of my head - Andi wrote this
> patch - have a look in xfs_log.c.

Machines with more than 400MB get 8 logbufs with 256K 

You won't see it in /proc/mounts though because the mechanism is 
internal in XFS and not visible in the linux mount arguments.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>