xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs barfing on TB fs.

To: Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs barfing on TB fs.
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:36:45 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <11738.1068157873@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
References: <3FAA9F75.7915E777@calibredigital.com> <11738.1068157873@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
hi Greg,

On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:31:13AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:22:29 -0500, 
> Greg Whynott <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol
> >create_bounce_R__ver_create_bounce not found in System.map.  Ignoring
> >ksyms_base entry
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol
> >highmem_start_page_R__ver_highmem_start_page not found in System.map. 
> >Ignoring ksyms_base entry
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol kmap_high_R__ver_kmap_high not
> >found in System.map.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol kmap_prot_R__ver_kmap_prot not
> >found in System.map.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol kmap_pte_R__ver_kmap_pte not
> >found in System.map.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
> >Warning (compare_maps): ksyms_base symbol kunmap_high_R__ver_kunmap_high
> >not found in System.map.  Ignoring ksyms_base entry
> 
> Those ksymoops messages indicate an incomplete kernel build.  At some
> stage you switched the value of CONFIG_HIGHMEM and rebuilt but the
> kernel build process did not get it right, one of the many known kbuild
> 2.4 bugs.
> 
> It has probably not caused any problems, OTOH it cannot be ruled out as
> a possible cause of your problem.  Can you do a complete kernel build
> starting from make mrproper and see if the problem still exists?

And if you have a reproducible test case showing this problem,
I would _really_ like to hear the details, please -- an exact
recipe, from go (mkfs) to woe would be extremely helpful.

Thanks for reporting the problem, btw.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>