| To: | Cory Visi <merlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS recovery issues |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:03:49 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>, Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309231053140.32341-100000@phear.lwz.org>; from merlin@phear.lwz.org on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:56:09AM -0400 |
| References: | <20030923142740.A15989@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309231053140.32341-100000@phear.lwz.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:56:09AM -0400, Cory Visi wrote: > Thank you for tipping me off to compiler/gcc problems. I was compiling the > kernel with -Os. When I reverted this back to -O2, XFS recovery began > working. > > Should XFS be able to be compiled with -Os? Is my gcc doing something > funky with -Os? Hopefully this experience will become helpful to someone. A kernel (and thus XFS) generally should work with either -Os or -O2. If -Os still doesn't work with gcc3.3 / CVS HEAD I'd fill a bugreport against gcc. Not sure whether you want to invest that time, though.. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PARTIAL TAKE 901191 -, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS recovery issues, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE 901803 -, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |