| To: | Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Net Llama! <netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22 |
| From: | Florian Schanda <ma1flfs@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:38:57 +0000 |
| Cc: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309020832080.12312-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309020832080.12312-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 13:33, Mike Burger wrote:
> It's a legal/bureaucratic mess. The US government has restrictions on the
> export of cryptographical technologies. If you intend to make something
> available for international consumption, which has crypto capabilities,
> you need to make sure that it meets US federal guidelines or that it's
> approved, otherwise.
Correct me if I'm mistaken,
but isn't it an XFS-patch we're talking about here? The cryptoapi is in the
vanilla kernel, not the in XFS patch.
Florian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/VLmWfCf8muQVS4cRAl/YAJ40NRj6+SnsCJCjpbWwKNh5bQKulwCdEWLN
caVdYACLglLggfuZ3/JtC+0=
=CuZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22, Mike Burger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22, Mike Burger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question in XFS regarding Kernel 2.4.22, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |