| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Processes stuck in D state (leading to extremely high load) |
| From: | Stefan Roehrich <stefan@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:00:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | Tobias Schill <toschi@xxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030821135259.GC29202@leathercollection.ph> |
| References: | <20030821122939.GB1922@stefan.roehri.ch> <20030821135259.GC29202@leathercollection.ph> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On 2003-08-21 21:52:59, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> just couldn't nail the cause. I haven't been seing the problem, though,
> and it seems to have all stopped when I changed my SDRAM which MemTest86
> found to have some very minor hard-to-find errors. Perhaps you could
Thank you for the hint, but the XFS filesystems are on an external
SCSI storage and we tried with two machines (of the same type) and
different memory and processor constellations, so we think a hardware
failure (if it's not a design bug in the servers) is not so likely.
And it works with the 2.4.21-rc1-xfs kernel CVS version from May, so
if it would be a hardware issue, there must be another access pattern
or similar things.
Stefan
--
Stefan Röhrich stefan@xxxxxxxxx, sr@xxxxxxxx
http://www.roehri.ch/~sr/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] One more bugfix for xfs_lowbit64, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] One more bugfix for xfs_lowbit64, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Processes stuck in D state (leading to extremely high load), Federico Sevilla III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Processes stuck in D state (leading to extremely high load), Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |