| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | vnodeops |
| From: | Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2003 05:19:08 +0100 |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
So is there any reason to keep the vnodeops layer around? There's only one implementation of it (xfs_vnodeops) so it seems kind of pointless. Removing it would probably shrink xfs quite a bit, both source and binary. -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Better patch to remove VOP_ACCESS and vop_access, Matthew Wilcox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: vnodeops, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Better patch to remove VOP_ACCESS and vop_access, Matthew Wilcox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: vnodeops, Ethan Benson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |