| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3 |
| From: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:07:24 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307212257400.17138-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Mail-copies-to: | nobody |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20030722003443.GA13188@plato.local.lan> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307212257400.17138-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:00:24PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > We're very interested in this patch, we just have not had the time > to fully vet it & get it applied to the tree. > > If folks on the list who are interested in this sort of thing could give > it a whirl, and report experiences, it would be helpful. > > In general, the patch looks like a good thing, I/we just need some breathing > space to really look at it before we apply it to CVS. I still also want to know if these bits should be inherited by new children of a directory with these bits set. ext2 does this for all of them, IMO it only makes sense for SYNC. > Thanks Ethan! your welcome. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #3, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |