On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 09:58:10PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> The globals stuff has been reworked again - to avoid shooting
> ourselves in the foot like this in the future. Not a lot of other
> differences I think.
Please pardon my confusion.
Does this mean that the only major difference between the respun split
patches and the initial split patches plus the xfs_globals.c patch
posted by Ethan Benson on 2003-06-28 09:23 UTC [1] is that you cleaned
things up to prevent you from comitting the same mistake next time?
Or is the combination of the original split patches and the
xfs_globals.c patch not enough, so people like me who use that
combination should schedule a kernel upgrade using the respun patches
ASAP?
Thank you very much for helping me decide wether an upgrade will be
necessary or not.
--> Jijo
[1] http://marc.free.net.ph/message/20030628.092344.7eff097d.html
--
Federico Sevilla III : http://jijo.free.net.ph : When we speak of free
Network Administrator : The Leather Collection, Inc. : software we refer to
GnuPG Key ID : 0x93B746BE : freedom, not price.
|