On 2003-06-20 06:38 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> > What's the wisdom on building a kernel with ACL support for both
> > ext2/ext3 and XFS ? I tried applying patches in this order :
> >
> > linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2
> > ea-2.4.20-0.8.58.diff.gz
> > acl-2.4.20-0.8.57.diff.gz
> > nfsacl-2.4.20-0.8.59.diff.gz
> > xfs-2.4.20-split-only.bz2
> > xfs-2.4.20-split-quota32.bz2
> > xfs-2.4.20-split-kernel.bz2
> > xfs-2.4.20-split-misc.bz2
> > xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2
> >
> > It goes fine modulo a bunch of "(offset N lines)" messages but as
> > soon as I reach xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2, problems appear
> > ("Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R?").
>
> The spilt ACL patch should not be needed if you have already
> applied Andreas' ACL patches - IIRC, this contains just the
> VFS changes to get ACLs functional (which is common between
> both patch sets).
Actually, it would seem that it contains things not in Andrea's
patches. It creates include/linux/posix_acl_xattr.h and adds a few
bits here and there. The following worked for me :
tar -xjvf linux-2.4.20.tar.bz2
cd linux-2.4.20
zcat ../ea-2.4.20-0.8.58.diff.gz | patch -p1
zcat ../acl-2.4.20-0.8.57.diff.gz | patch -p1
zcat ../nfsacl-2.4.20-0.8.59.diff.gz | patch -p1
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-only.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-quota32.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-kernel.bz2 | patch -p1
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-misc.bz2 | patch -p1
# -N is required -- there's overlap between Grünbacher's and SGI's diffs
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-acl.bz2 | patch -p1 -N
bzcat ../xfs-2.4.20-split-dmapi.bz2 | patch -p1
Thank you.
--
André Majorel <amajorel@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
|