xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tomorrow

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Tomorrow
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 21:08:43 -0800
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@blake.timetraveller.org>
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1053694002.2887.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1053697162.21472.51.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20030523134438.GC30288@wotan.suse.de> <20030523150530.A31022@infradead.org> <20030524071709.GK27626@plato.local.lan> <20030524095245.A24074@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0305270026390.17955@blake.timetraveller.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:39:12AM -0400, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > > seems like a sad thing to put such cruft into a decent filesystem just
> > > to support a broken legacy OS.
> >
> > I will make sure it'll be a config option.
> 
> Loadable module I trust :)
> 
> While we're on the XFS wishlist, I think that implementation of
> "immutable" and "append-only" attributes as seen in ext2/3 would be a
> great boon for the filesystem.

yes it would be helpful. and not very difficult. (for someone familier
with xfs internals).

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgp9VEWQFnQSP.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>