| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and MD devices. |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:50:08 +1000 |
| Cc: | Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <yq11xzlwfab.fsf@austin.mkp.net> |
| References: | <87sms1jtot.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <yq11xzlwfab.fsf@austin.mkp.net> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Pittman <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Daniel> I think tried to create an XFS filesystem on it and, > Daniel> annoyingly, got told that my MD array was not clean. > > Hrm, I agree that the degraded RAID1 case is valid. As long as the > array is operational, we shouldn't care. Printing the warning would > suffice. > > Nathan? > This has been the behavior for a couple of weeks now (since the 2.4.6 version of xfsprogs). cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | raid5: switching cache buffer size, Daryl Herzmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Evms-devel] question on some evms features, Kwon SoonSon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and MD devices., Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and MD devices., Daniel Pittman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |