xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state.

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More processes hanging in 'D' state.
From: Kelledin <kelledin+XFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:09:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <200304271139.12358.kelledin+XFS@skarpsey.dyndns.org>
References: <200304271139.12358.kelledin+XFS@skarpsey.dyndns.org>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1
On Sunday 27 April 2003 11:39 am, Kelledin wrote:
> Currently, I've got a kernel compiled with the 2003-04-07
> patchset (excluding the kdb-i386 patch).  It's been running
> for two days, and just now it got two processes stuck in 'D'
> state.

Well...@*#%.  More info.

I just tried going into that self-same problem directory and 
running "strace ls -lR" to see if I could track where it 
hangs...and both 'D'-state processes instantly un-hung.  The 
strace completes without issue.

This does not make me happy at all.  I still know there's a bug, 
and I'm no closer to tracking it down than I was.  Not to 
mention which, I've got to try to reproduce this condition all 
over again, just to track it down.

(/me roars furious oaths in Germanic.)

It's like the damn thing chose the worst possible time to be on 
its best behavior.  Sigh.

Maybe someone else can glean a clue from this strange sequence of 
events?

-- 
Kelledin
"If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does 
it still cost four figures to fix?"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>