| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released) |
| From: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2003 08:41:10 +0200 |
| Cc: | chris@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3EA5FDDC.6090707@thebarn.com> |
| References: | <3E9EC641.6050901@freesurf.ch> <3E9F7422.4060108@stesmi.com> <3E9F87D8.6070904@freesurf.ch> <3EA01003.6090604@stesmi.com> <1050851772.2928.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3EA5FDDC.6090707@thebarn.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:43:40PM -0500, Russell Cattelan wrote: > I think the problem it when the files are copied to /boot/grub and not > necessarily > when grub is installed. > I still thing the best it to do a remount,ro then a remount,rw > the remount read only code has special code to sync the fs. I still wonder what is different at install time vs later. Why doesn't the XFS /boot cope with that correctly, and why should XFS later do the right thing with /usr /home etc.? I don't want to sound negative, I like to use XFS, but this makes me feel very uncomfortable. :( -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released), Stefan Smietanowski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and filesytem shutdown (was: Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released), Stefan Smietanowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |