| To: | Gabor Forgacs <gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: direct io performance problem |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:41:05 +0000 |
| Cc: | xfs mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <007001c2e3eb$9ff13500$0104a8c0@avalanche>; from gabor@colorfront.com on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:21:04PM +0100 |
| References: | <007001c2e3eb$9ff13500$0104a8c0@avalanche> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:21:04PM +0100, Gabor Forgacs wrote: > Hi all > > we are testing the disk speed on linux, here how it is going: I'd suggest using vendors kernel (i.e. the XFS patches redhat RPMs or SuSE's tree, they have certain important I/O fixes that mainline is still missing). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
| Previous by Thread: | direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: direct io performance problem, Gabor Forgacs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |