| To: | "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS vs. ext3 |
| From: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Feb 2003 11:16:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-list@xxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030226150442.GC23962@think.thunk.org> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>, linux-list@xxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20030226044329.GP2107@dkp.com> <20030226150442.GC23962@think.thunk.org> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 10:04:42AM -0500,
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what was the configuration of the Samba
> server? How much memory, CPU, disks, etc.? Specifically, was
> it an SMP machine?
Nope, it's not SMP. Specs:
Single processor Pentium III 800MHz
768MB RAM
ASUS CUBX rev 1.02 MB
6 Maxtor 120GB 5400rpm HDs
1 Onboard ATA66 CMD648 controller
2 Promise PCI ATA100 100TX/2 controllers (20268 chipset)
Intel 1000BaseT server NIC
Partitioned like so:
md2 (data array I was writing to) :
active raid5 hde4[0] hdg4[1] hdi4[2] hdk4[3] hdm4[4] hdo4[5]
592433920 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
md0 (root array) :
active raid5 hde3[0] hdg3[1] hdi3[2] hdk3[3] hdm3[4] hdo3[5]
5243520 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 0 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
md1 (boot array) :
active raid1 hde1[0] hdg1[1]
131392 blocks [2/2] [UU]
Andrew Klaassen
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Austin Gonyou |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - fix a bad merge from irix, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS vs. ext3, Andrew Klaassen |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - acl/attr updates, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |