xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Yet Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question]

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Yet Another mkfs.xfs RAID Question]
From: Christian Guggenberger <Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:26:48 +0100
Reply-to: Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Guggenberger 
> >>>>> <Christian.Guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Christian> I'm going to set up a new 1.7 TB HW Raid 5 next week.  RAID
> Christian> 5 contains 11 disks, Stripe Unit should be (according to
> Christian> the manual) 128k.  so my mkfs.xfs options will be
> Christian> sunit=256, swidth=2560 for the data section, won't they?
> 
> Yup.
> 
> 
> Christian> I will definitly use internal log, so I'd like to ask, if I
> Christian> should use logversion 2, and what sunit and swidth values I
> Christian> should use here?  I guess the same as for the data
> Christian> section???
> 
> 128KB log alignment seems a bit of an overkill.
> 
> Does your controller state which chunk size it uses internally?  Most
> controllers use 4-16KB blocks for RAID5.  So try aligning your log to
> values in that neighbourhood.
> 
thanks for your quick answer!
The only Documentation about stripe or chunk size I got from the vendor is,
to use 32k chunk size for random read/write optimaziation or 128k chunk for
sequentiell read/write optimaziation... No mention about what the contoller
does internally!

so I will stay with logversion 1 and sunit, switdh arguments for data
section as mentioned above.

@Walt, yes its an hardware Raid5

thanks
Christian


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>