| To: | "Tang Lingbo(Allan)" <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS data corruption 2 |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:10:33 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <LFEKLKBIIOCNDINOFFJGOEKKGHAA.allan@mountainviewdata.com> |
| References: | <20021210205115.GA2505@tapu.f00f.org> <LFEKLKBIIOCNDINOFFJGOEKKGHAA.allan@mountainviewdata.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 09:27:54AM +0800, Tang Lingbo(Allan) wrote: > How about to use O_SYNC for file data change? Sure, that should work. Performance will suck. > It's also impossible to make sure the last write? I would *guess* it will work, but it should be tested. However, if it does work, don't expect it to always work. You *cannot* assume that writing to a file is the be-all-and-end-all for data security --- it's not. Mail Transfer Agents know this and have code to deal with this as appropriate. --cw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bug 202] XFS data corruption, bugzilla-daemon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Bug 202] XFS data corruption, bugzilla-daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: XFS data corruption 2, Tang Lingbo\(Allan\) |
| Next by Thread: | [Bug 202] New: XFS data corruption, bugzilla-daemon |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |