On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:41:30AM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > just curios, why are using lvm-1.1rc2?
> >
> > I thought the 1.1 series are very buggy and abandoned?
> > I've read this some time ago on the lvm Homepage but for now I can't find
> > that article again...
>
> Which one should I use? The default with the kernel (2.4.19)
> or lvm-2.1.95.10 or lvm-2.0-{latest or beta}?
>
>
hmmm, personally I can't say anything about lvm2(any version) cause I've
never had tried it. I don't use lvm heavily, so ....
Maybe a good starting point would be the 1.0.5 release (the source code
provides some advice how to create a patch against your kernel, as lvm
in 2.4.19 is version 1.0.3).
I'll try to find that article I talked about in my previous mail.
We're using lvm-1.0.4 userland tools (debian package) and pure CVS XFS
kernels.
Maybe evms would be a look worth, too, but I've also have no experiences
with it.
Some insights by others are very welcome!
Christian
|