xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ext3-users] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.

To: Fabien Combernous <fcombernous@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ext3-users] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:08:26 -0600
Cc: ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr>
Mail-followup-to: Fabien Combernous <fcombernous@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion <jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, reiserfs <reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3DB823AA.6010405@eprocess.fr>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Oct 24, 2002  18:45 +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:
> +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | quotas | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled |
> |        | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data  |
> +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+

Granted that I have never used quotas, so it is possible that I
am incorrect.  However, my understanding is that yes, you do need
data-journaled quota files to ensure that your quota tables don't miss
some operations after a crash.  However, you can separately select
data journaling for files in ext3 (via chattr), even if the rest of
the filesystem is using data=ordered (the default).

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>