| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.4.18-14SGI_XFS_1.2a1] acl problems |
| From: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:56:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1034700741.7978.7.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20021011010713.GA4254@bonzo.nirvana> <20021011014047.GA27651@tapu.f00f.org> <20021011020437.GA1144622@down.physik.fu-berlin.de> <20021011211538.GA27574@sgi.com> <20021011010713.GA4254@bonzo.nirvana> <1034370565.14233.33.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> <20021012153026.GA17332@bonzo.nirvana> <20021012204316.GP13549@plato.local.lan> <1034700741.7978.7.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:52:20AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Ok, here's a patch that seems to take care of all the problems... I am > not an acl-guru by -any- means though, so I'd appreciate any testing & > sanity-checking. I'll ask the sgi acl-gurus to look at it as well. The small testcase I scripted does well on it (1.2pre1 with your patch). Not only the permissions bit seem to be fine now, but also the ghost-acl entries are gone. > (I'm not very happy with the test -x fix, it seems like this should be > much earlier - perhaps even the vfs could just take care of this for > us...) Definitely makes me happy! ;) Thanks, Axel. -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.20-pre10-aa1: unresolved symbol in xfs.o, Andrea Arcangeli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Gaurenteed file write??, Greg Freemyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.4.18-14SGI_XFS_1.2a1] acl problems (was: root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback?), Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | XFS 1.1 unlink() weirdness, Mihai RUSU |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |