xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re[2]: Suse 8.1 and XFS 1.1

To: Raymond <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Suse 8.1 and XFS 1.1
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:59:42 -0700
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200209272316.06050.support@bigriverinfotech.com>
References: <200209272201.32561.support@bigriverinfotech.com> <20020928052848.GA23028@tapu.f00f.org> <200209272316.06050.support@bigriverinfotech.com>
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:16:06PM -0700, Raymond wrote:

> How 'bout Redhat 8.0 and Debian Woody?

Debian has had support for XFS for a while in a sense (ie.  it's a
pain to install XFS root filesystem but otherwise not too bad).  There
are XFS install disks for Debian that have been floating about for
about a year or so too.

<pause>

        http://people.debian.org/~blade/XFS-Install/

seems to contain relevant information.

No idea about Redhat ...


FWIW, I run Debian across about 20 machines and they are almost all
XFS, *none* of these required anything special to install, I just made
a kernel to my liking with nfsroot support and booted the machines via
nfsroot where I could then install the OS over the network pretty much
automatically.  This means each machine takes about 30 minutes to
install, 25 of which I don't need to attend.

The only slightly tricky one was my laptop because it didn't have
builtin networking...



  --cw



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>